16 Comments
User's avatar
JUDY REEVES's avatar

Hear! Hear! Brooke. Thanks for being a voice for all of us. Well done.

Expand full comment
Linda Black's avatar

Thanks for this Brooke. Sparked a juicy convo with a guy over coffee. 😬 educational piece that helps inform my own understanding of the issues. Great read 💕

Expand full comment
Brooke Warner's avatar

Ha. I’m glad!

Expand full comment
Shelley Blanton-Stroud's avatar

Thanks for sharing this. Also thanks for the links to the other articles. (I read them all instead of doing laundry. An excellent decision.)

Expand full comment
Niki Wilson's avatar

What an extraordinary expose. Thanks for giving this attention. This is my first post from you-guess I’m hooked now! 💕

Expand full comment
Brooke Warner's avatar

Thank you for reading and subscribing!

Expand full comment
Susan's avatar

Thank you thank you, Brooke, for calling this out--and for putting the blame where it belongs. Little Brown failed with this one. Big time.

Expand full comment
Amy Ferris's avatar

I love you. Thank you for writing this piece.

Expand full comment
John Kirsch's avatar

Like I said I'm not defending or attacking Wenner's words.

I'm defending his right to say them without being punished.

"Yay free speech" has a derisive ring to it.

Expand full comment
John Kirsch's avatar

As an author, Wenner is only required to say what he wants to say, in whatever way he wants.

The phrase "social responsibility" has a nebulous, somewhat ominous ring to it. Who gets to decide what it means and why do they get to do that?

Expand full comment
Brooke Warner's avatar

You are probably Wenner’s exact target reader. His statements are extreme and will win him fans and enemies for it, undoubtedly. A friend of mine suggested it was a publicity stunt. Maybe so. Maybe so.

Expand full comment
John Kirsch's avatar

If it's your book, you can exclude or include anyone you want.

Otherwise it isn't your book. It's someone else's.

Expand full comment
Brooke Warner's avatar

You're correct, but that's not what this piece is about. The piece is about the social responsibility of someone in Wenner's position to recognize that rock-n-roll includes more than just white men, and about his publisher's responsibility not to continue to prop up the racial and gender animus that has defined the industry for decades. Wenner can do whatever he wants, and he did.

Expand full comment
John Kirsch's avatar

I'm not defending or attacking what Wenner said.

What I'm defending is his right to say it without being punished.

Expand full comment
Brooke Warner's avatar

I guess I don't understand this, John. You can say anything you want. Yay free speech. But if someone says racist and misogynist things, and gets called out for it, then it's also the right of the people who felt attacked (in this case women and Black people) to say whatever they want in response. That's what's happening here. Jenner got ejected from the Hall of Fame because there were consequences for his actions. The publisher hasn't is likely not going to cancel his book. So defend away, but maybe take a look at what you're defending.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 18, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Brooke Warner's avatar

I've been hearing this theory and I'm sure there's some truth to it. We're living in a sad time where misogynistic and racist comments surely result in more book sales. I will not be buying the book!

Expand full comment