Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Candice Abraham's avatar

I’ve been thinking about these things for a while and have formed a different opinion. I think, as a person of colour, a woman, a minority also by religion as well, there’s something that has still really bothered me about the wave of bringing in more “diverse” books. My question first centers around what is the actual definition of “diversity” in American and Canadian publishing. It seems as if, by example, that definition is anything written by authors who are not white, with authors who identify as BIPOC being at the pinnacle. I completely understand this in terms of seeing a greater number of voices and characters being represented in books, which for so long was not the case. The part where I started to take pause and still do is that the diversity in books seems to be largely about VISUAL representation and NOT about actual diversity. Because to actually represent diversity this has to move beyond skin colour and it is diversity of thought that also has to be represented ALONG WITH visual diversity. So, for example, what about a book about a black kid who doesn’t support Black Lives Matter? Or a black academic who doesn’t support anti-racist rhetoric? And before anyone freaks out over me saying this…I’m not commenting on whether or not people who don’t support these causes/rhetorics are good or bad. The fact is, there are very smart blank people, women, people of colour, who have different views who are not represented in publishing because most of publishing doesn’t agree with their views. The point is, true diversity means publishing the views of people who we don’t agree with. And I think THIS is where the backlash for anything comes from. The fact is not everyone (even within BIPOC AND POC) agrees that racism/patriarchy should be discussed/dealt with/healed the same way. Not everyone agrees with second-wave feminism (and to be clear I’m not saying I don’t). But if we shut out these voices and call them racist, misogynists, or “self-hating” as BIPOC and POC that aren’t on the “left” are actually called, then there’s nothing truly diverse about what we’re publishing. It’s just farce, and also racist in its own right because it supports a view that all BIPOC and POC have the same views and think the same thing and aren’t actually people with a diversity of views among them. To me, this is the real “backlash” publishing is facing right now. Because there’s a lot of us who feel the diversity wave of 2020 was a show from the start. I think that a lot of people who didn’t see that then may be the ones who feel that the backlash is nothing more than a fight for the status quo now.

Expand full comment
Amy Ferris's avatar

Your voice is so very needed - you ignite our passion to make change. Thank you. I love you.

Expand full comment
30 more comments...

No posts