Yes, We’re Living Through a Backlash in Book Publishing
The Ingredients That Comprise the Stew of Our Current Moment
back·lash
/ˈbakˌlaSH/
a strong and adverse reaction by a large number of people, especially to a social or political development.
I read the 15th-anniversary edition of Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women, by Susan Faludi, which came out in 2006. In 1991, when the book was first published, I was a high school sophomore, not sophisticated enough to grapple with the book’s messages—or its inherent consequences to me as a young woman growing up in the United States.
But by 2006, I was thirty—and I got the message loud and clear. I nodded along and underlined passages. The gist of the book, in case you haven’t read it or don’t remember, was her identification of a media-driven “backlash” that was targeting and blaming second-wave feminism for women’s problems, many of which she argued were created to keep women in their place/roll back the clock. Faludi identified backlashes as historical trends that resort to “blaming the victim” for the illusory problems that arise out of their own advances. In other words, advancement results in backlash by groups of people who have an invested stake in the status quo, and the people making the progress become the problem.
Faludi did not write about race in her book, but its ideas are 100% applicable to progress being made by racial and sexual minority groups, and a good book to read or re-read if you want to understand our current moment. Michele Goldberg wrote an opinion piece in the NYT last year (“America Is Triggered By Progress”), noting that “one of Faludi’s central insights was that backlashes rear up not when women have achieved equality but when they seem to be on the brink of achieving it.”
So let’s apply this to book publishing and DEI, right here and now. Four short years ago, in the aftermath of George Floyd’s murder and the racial reckoning that followed, book publishing made a commitment to hire more “diversely.” You heard heads of house talking about their commitments to do better. Every house and organization in the country was doing their due diligence on DEI training. Over the next couple years, major publishing houses and other literary institutions announced a series high-profile senior Black and Latinx editorial hires. The list below is taken verbatim from a PEN report called Reading Between the Lines: Race, Equity, and Book Publishing; the boldfaced names indicate people who’ve since left or been ousted, Lisa Lucas just last week.
In April 2020, Nadxieli Nieto joined Flatiron as executive editor
In July 2020, Lisa Lucas, was hired as publisher of Pantheon and Schocken Books, two PRH imprints
In July 2020, Krishan Trotman, started a new Hachette imprint focused on underrepresented voices called Legacy Lit
In September 2020, Jamia Wilson was named an executive editor at Random House
In 2020 and 2021, Dana Canedy, LaSharah Bunting, and Aminda Marqués González joined Simon & Schuster, Canedy as senior vice president and publisher of the Simon & Schuster imprint; Bunting as vice president and executive editor; Marqués González as a vice president and executive editor.
In February 2021, Jennifer Baker joined Amistad Books, the HarperCollins imprint, as senior editor.
In March 2021, Yahdon Israel joined Simon & Schuster as a senior editor.
In August 2021, Denne Michele Norris was named editor-in-chief at Electric Literature.
In December 2021, Adenike Olanrewaju joined HarperCollins as executive director.
In February 2022, Milena Brown, formerly the associate director of marketing at Simon & Schuster, joined Doubleday, part of PRH, as marketing director
In February 2022, Retha Powers joined Henry Holt & Co. as vice president and executive editor
In July 2022, Carmen Giménez was named director of the independent Graywolf Press
For those keeping count, that’s fourteen hires and four dismissals. In other words, 28% within just a couple to few years of being hired.
When I heard that Lisa Lucas had been fired last week, then saw the immediate and swift stunned reaction by, well, everyone, I had my own series of speculations:
PRH paid a lot of money to get her. Their fault, not hers.
One of Lucas’s most high-profile acquisitions was Nana Kwame Adjei-Brenyah’s Chain Gang All Stars. The book has sold 45,000 copies to date (according to Bookscan), undoubtedly good sales, even great—but Adjei-Brenyah renegotiated his advance on the heels of #PublishingPaidMe. If Lucas advocated for this increase, which she surely would have, and Adjei-Brenyah isn’t all that close to earning out, it could be a mark against her rather than a reason to celebrate.
I don’t personally know Lucas, but I do know she’s a strong, opinionated, and powerful woman, and I know that when working inside white male culture, that’s valued until it’s not. My guess is that Lucas was pushing, advocating, for the real and meaningful change she was brought into do. At first, this was probably celebrated, then only tolerated. Too much, too fast may have been the message she received. And if she didn’t heed it, she may have made some key enemies, or even just one, at the tippy-toppiest level, which is all it takes.
Pertinent to Speculation #3, my tipping point for leaving traditional publishing was over a book I wanted to acquire about trans families. I was curating Seal Press’s LGBTQ list at the time. I went to acquisitions, presented my case. I had a strong reputation and could pretty much bring in what I wanted, but the message after the meeting was loud and clear: acquire this book if you really want to, but if it fails, it’s on you.
I didn’t have the courage to take that chance. I wasn’t willing to put my job on the line for that book. Lisa Lucas may well have been more courageous than me. She may have gotten a similar message, maybe more than once, but forged on anyway.
This is admittedly conjecture, but what I do know is that the turnover rate on these diverse hires is startling. And there are reasons, which are systemic, and which we should find disturbing. People may be getting fired because they’re not a good “fit,” but that speaks to racial and sexual minorities entering into a monoculture in which a good fit is never going to be possible.
Real change involves real listening. It means engaging in dialogue with those whose opinions and actions might rub you the wrong way and asking yourself why their opinions and actions rub you the wrong way. I have heard countless mostly white men, but some white women, too, saying that they can’t get published right now because the landscape is hostile to white authors. This is provably untrue, but this belief system and the articulation of it contributes to the backlash. Once the privileged class start feeling like the victim, and voicing discontent of said victimhood, we’ve got the ingredients for the stew of backlash readied for the pot.
Consider the firing of these high-profile Black editors as the carrots in our current stew. Book bans are the celery. The onions are cancelations, and cancel culture—which cuts both ways, unfortunately. The fallout from #OwnVoices (which quickly became weaponized by white writers and the industry as “woke culture” gone mad) is an example of a good idea that got crushed due to people projecting onto it more than it was ever meant to mean (read more here). Books are censored on the Left and the Right, though one could argue that the books being tagged as “problematic” on the Left are singled out for their racist, misogynistic, and homophobic depictions, whereas the books being targeted by the Right are ones that advocate for minority culture and rights (with anti-racist content, gay protagonists, and normalizing of the trans experience). Out of all this progress, “wokeness” has emerged as the accusation de jour, which works to blame the people pushing for progress (which you’ll recall, is the definition of backlash).
So, here we are. To me, Lisa Lucas’s dismissal is a big deal and we need to keep talking about it. This week on Write-minded, the podcast I cohost with Grant Faulkner, our guest is Dhonielle Clayton, bestselling author, COO of We Need Diverse Books, friend of Lucas’s. If you’re interested in the topics I’m writing about here, please listen to the show (which you can find wherever you listen to podcasts). Clayton is fighting the fight, names this moment for what it is, and calls out the haters—all much appreciated.
In book publishing, being part of the solution means changing the way you think about whose voices have the right to be heard. It means reading the works of all kinds of authors, especially people who don’t look like you or share your lived experience. It means caring about a high-profile firing, like Lisa Lucas’s. It means opening our eyes to the flame being turned up on the stew and taking measures to prevent it from boiling over.
Check out the resources offered at WeNeedDiverseBooks.com, and AuthorsAgainstBookBans.com to take some actions.
Further Reading:
Penguin Random House Dismisses Two of Its Top Publishers
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/20/books/booksupdate/knopf-doubleday-lisa-lucas-reagan-arthur.html
Publishing Pledged to Diversify. Change Has Been Slow.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/28/books/publishing-books-poc-dei.html
A reckoning long overdue: Dana Canedy and Lisa Lucas on their new positions in publishing
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/books/story/2020-07-30/dana-canedy-and-lisa-lucas-new-publishers-in-conversation
Reading Between the Lines: Race, Equity, and Book Publishing
https://pen.org/report/race-equity-and-book-publishing/
Booklash: Literary Freedom, Online Outrage, and the Language of Harm
https://pen.org/report/booklash/
Six Black Women Executives Left Positions In Hollywood Within Weeks—Yet the Industry Is Silent
https://www.ebony.com/six-black-women-executives-left-positions-in-hollywood-within-weeks-yet-the-industry-is-silent/
The Demise of #OwnVoices
https://quillandquire.com/omni/opinion-the-demise-of-ownvoices/
I’ve been thinking about these things for a while and have formed a different opinion. I think, as a person of colour, a woman, a minority also by religion as well, there’s something that has still really bothered me about the wave of bringing in more “diverse” books. My question first centers around what is the actual definition of “diversity” in American and Canadian publishing. It seems as if, by example, that definition is anything written by authors who are not white, with authors who identify as BIPOC being at the pinnacle. I completely understand this in terms of seeing a greater number of voices and characters being represented in books, which for so long was not the case. The part where I started to take pause and still do is that the diversity in books seems to be largely about VISUAL representation and NOT about actual diversity. Because to actually represent diversity this has to move beyond skin colour and it is diversity of thought that also has to be represented ALONG WITH visual diversity. So, for example, what about a book about a black kid who doesn’t support Black Lives Matter? Or a black academic who doesn’t support anti-racist rhetoric? And before anyone freaks out over me saying this…I’m not commenting on whether or not people who don’t support these causes/rhetorics are good or bad. The fact is, there are very smart blank people, women, people of colour, who have different views who are not represented in publishing because most of publishing doesn’t agree with their views. The point is, true diversity means publishing the views of people who we don’t agree with. And I think THIS is where the backlash for anything comes from. The fact is not everyone (even within BIPOC AND POC) agrees that racism/patriarchy should be discussed/dealt with/healed the same way. Not everyone agrees with second-wave feminism (and to be clear I’m not saying I don’t). But if we shut out these voices and call them racist, misogynists, or “self-hating” as BIPOC and POC that aren’t on the “left” are actually called, then there’s nothing truly diverse about what we’re publishing. It’s just farce, and also racist in its own right because it supports a view that all BIPOC and POC have the same views and think the same thing and aren’t actually people with a diversity of views among them. To me, this is the real “backlash” publishing is facing right now. Because there’s a lot of us who feel the diversity wave of 2020 was a show from the start. I think that a lot of people who didn’t see that then may be the ones who feel that the backlash is nothing more than a fight for the status quo now.
Your voice is so very needed - you ignite our passion to make change. Thank you. I love you.